skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Q: When my
kindergartner become embarrassed, she digs in her heels and becomes ridiculously
obstinate and defiant. It doesn’t matter if the embarrassment is due to a
reprimand or mistake. Pouting, stomping, crying, covering of ears, etc.,
ensues. We’ve tried explaining that everyone makes mistakes but that hasn’t
helped. I don’t want this to become an issue in the classroom. What can we do?
|
Image courtesy of Ambro/ FreeDigitalPhotos.net
|
A: Ah, the old “why” instead of a action. Because you think
her reaction is because she’s embarrassed, you’ve given her a pass on how she
acts. The truth of the matter is she is throwing a temper tantrum whenever
something happens she didn’t want to occur—either her own fault or not. You’ve
allowed her to continue with this stomping, pouting, wailing and gnashing of
teeth and now it’s time to put an end to it.
Stop trying to reason with your child. She’s not going to
listen or understand, so save your breath and use it to address the real
problem: her temper tantrums. At this age, solving it should be fairly easy if
you’re consistent. Designate a rarely used room in the house as the tantrum (a
powder room or guest room works well). Tell her that she needs to go to that
room whenever she’s embarrassed and feels like crying, stomping, covering her
ears, etc. Then you remind her, leading her by the hand, to the room, where she
stays by herself until she stops having the tantrum.
Your job is to help her remember to go to the room whenever
she has a tantrum. A temper tantrum without an audience is like a fire without oxygen:
both burn out rather quickly in its absence.
In October, Sarah will
be giving a series of talks on The Well-Behaved Child: Discipline that Really
Works through the City
of Fairfax Parks and Recreation Department. Also in October, Sarah and Mary
Elizabeth Peritti will speak on Parenting With Love & Leadership in a
four-part webinar series. Contact Sarah through her website for more
information.
Grandma was right!
There is an easy way and a hard way to raise kids. By and large, today’s
parents are choosing the hard way. This series of blogs will tackle familiar
phrases that used to be commonplace but fell out of favor during the last few
decades of the 20th century—and why parents should not be afraid to follow the
sentiment expressed in the phrases.
To those who think britches, an old-fashioned word for
pants, has nothing to do with child-rearing, I say read on! The phrase “You’re
acting too big for your britches” is one that should be employed by every
parent, if not in actual word, at least in sentiment.
Someone who’s too big for their pants is one who is too
arrogant. The origin of the phrase, “You’re too big for your britches” has its
roots in the 1830s and means one who
thinks too highly of himself than he ought to. In the middle of the last
century, the phrase was often said in conjunction with “If you don’t size
yourself to your britches, I’ll do it for you.”
A similar phrase used in previous generations of parents is “You
need to be taken down a peg or two,” which has its origin in the ancient
practice of ranking people on a vertical peg board, with one’s name represented
by a peg. The higher on the peg, the higher in society you ranked. Thus to be
taken down a notch or peg meant that you had gotten above your station in life
and needed to be reminded of your proper place.
Today, with many parents buying into the notion that
families are a democracy (that’s a discussion for another blog), the notion
that a child could in fact be acting above where she ought might smack of
classism. But nothing could be further from the truth when it comes to
children. Parents nowadays routinely allow their children to grow inflated egos,
to think themselves much more important than they should be.
In our quest for equality, we’ve forgotten what the parents
of yesteryear understood intuitively: that youngsters had no problem thinking
too highly of themselves and need to be taught otherwise. Basically, the phrase
“you’re too big for your britches” is an antidote to high self-esteem. A child with
high self-esteem, as I’ve talked about on this blog before, is one who puts
herself above all others, who focuses more on what her needs are than on the
needs of others, and who wants her needs attended to above all others.
A child who is too big for his britches is a child who wants
his way in everything. A child who is too big for his britches is one who
ignores his parents, his teachers and whoever else is standing in his way. A
child who is too big for his britches has an ego the size of Texas
and has no qualms about asserting his will in all things.
In other words, a child who’s too big for his britches is
one who is a big brat.
Now, if you don’t want a bratty child—and, seriously, who
does?—then you’d better start sizing your children to their proper size
britches. All that means is that when you see their little egos start to
inflate, you gently—you don’t have to be harsh about it to get the point across—take
then down a notch. This means, you teach them to put others first. This means,
you make them wait their turn. This means, you show them how to treat others
with respect and courtesy—and demand that same treatment from them towards you.
“You’re getting too big for your britches” is a golden oldie
when it comes to parenting phrases. Dust it off and give it a good workout—even
if you have to tell your kids what “britches” are.
Until next time,
Sarah
In October, Sarah will
be giving a series of talks on The Well-Behaved Child: Discipline that Really
Works through the City
of Fairfax Parks and Recreation Department. Also in October, Sarah and Mary
Elizabeth Peritti will speak on Parenting With Love & Leadership in a
four-part webinar series. Contact Sarah through her website for more information.
Q: I spot-check my
15-year-old daughter’s (“Ann”) social media sites—she knows this—and found a
posting by her close friend (“Sue”) that contained obscene language. Sue wrote,
“I didn’t write that, Ann did.” Thing is, neither one of the talk like that (at
least that I’ve ever heard), so it seems really out of character for either one
of them. They were together when the post was written. What can I do? It’s very
likely they will finger each other as the “real” writer of the post. Oh, and
both are honor students and generally stay out of trouble. Also, do I let Sue’s
mother know what I found out (we’re fairly close)?
|
Image courtesy of stockimages FreeDigitalPhotos.net
|
A: Many parents would commence the hunt for “the truth,” i.e.,
who really wrote the incriminating post. Thus begins the game of finger
pointing, tears, strained relationships between you and Sue’s parents, etc. The
whole thing becomes an exercise in futility because no matter who actually
wrote the post, both girls were present at the time it was uploaded and both
girls probably share some of the blame, either directly writing it or
indirectly egging on the one who did.
So save yourself time and hassle by skipping the hunting
part and moving toward the solution part, which is quite simple: take away Ann’s
access to social media and to her electronic devices for at least a month. If
she asks why, you can say that since her name was associated with such
language, she needs a break from social media. Make her go cold turkey from
electronic devices for 30 days and that should make her think twice in the future
to be even near someone who would post something like that under her name.
Lest you think that is too harsh, keep in mind that in a few
years, she will be searching for a job after college graduation. With more and
more employers trolling the Web to see what’s being said about job candidates,
do you really want her name associated with any filth out there? Not that she
needs to hear that—she won’t understand your reasons anyway—but that’s
something for you to keep in mind as you consider how to handle things like
this now and in the future.
Tread with care if you talk to Sue’s mother about the
posting. She might not want to hear that her daughter was associated with
something tawdry.
In October, Sarah will
be giving a series of talks on The Well-Behaved Child: Discipline that Really
Works through the City
of Fairfax Parks and Recreation Department. Also in October, Sarah and Mary
Elizabeth Peritti will speak on Parenting With Love & Leadership in a
four-part webinar series. Contact Sarah through her website for more
information.
Grandma was right! There is an easy way and a hard way to
raise kids. By and large, today’s parents are choosing the hard way. This
series of blogs (posted on Tuesdays) will tackle familiar phrases that used to
be commonplace but fell out of favor during the last few decades of the 20th
century—and why parents should not be afraid to follow the sentiment expressed
in the phrases.
Sixty years or so ago, mothers had a life of their own. They
weren’t waiting around for their children to “need” them—they were out having
cocktails with the neighbors, chairing committees and whipping up Jello-molds
with one hand tied behind their backs. Involved in their children’s lives? Not
on your life.
|
Image courtesy of Gualberto107/ FreeDigitalPhotos.net
|
Fast-forward to today: most mothers are over-involved in the
minutia that is their children’s lives. No detail is too small to be overlooked
or commented on, or scrapebooked. To say you didn’t want to get involved in
your children’s lives is tantamount to saying you don’t love your kids.
Which is why the phrase, “Don’t get me involved,” has fallen
way out of usage. Some of you reading this blog are wincing, wondering why any
decent, loving mother would want to say that to their child. Shouldn’t good
mothers be involved?
In a word, no. It all comes down to whose life is it anyway.
Is it your child’s life or yours? If your child’s life is yours, then you
should be involved. But your child’s life isn’t yours to live—it is your
child’s and your child’s alone. Or to put it another way: back off and let your
child live her own life.
That’s where “Don’t get me involved” comes into play.
Parents of yesteryear used this phrase to encourage their children to solve
their own problems, whether with school, siblings, friends, etc. Parents used
to know that the only person capable of solving the problem was the person
involved with the problem. In other words, when a child has a problem, the
child is the only person responsible for solving the problem.
The parent shouldn’t step in just because the child doesn’t
want to solve the problem. The parent shouldn’t shoulder the responsibility of
solving the problem because the child doesn’t want to or says he can’t solve
the problem. The only person capable of solving the child’ problem is the
child.
That’s the beauty of “Don’t get me involved.” Telling your
child when he comes to you with a problem, “Don’t get me involved,” reminds the
child that it’s his problem, not yours, and that your involvement will not
solve the problem, but instead will create more of an uncomfortable situation with
the child. This works especially well with sibling conflict. The only ones who
can solve sibling conflict are the siblings involved in the conflict. Telling said
siblings, “Don’t get me involved,” gives them more incentive to come to a conclusion
that satisfies all involved.
I encourage you to brush off the old chestnut “Don’t get me
involved,” and use it freely with your children. You might find that you can
join a book club, have a glass of wine by the fireplace or take up yoga with
all the free time you’ll have by not being overly involved in your children’s
lives.
In October, Sarah will
be giving a series of talks on The Well-Behaved Child: Discipline that Really
Works through the City
of Fairfax Parks and Recreation Department. Also in October, Sarah and Mary
Elizabeth Peritti will speak on Parenting With Love & Leadership in a
four-part webinar series. Contact Sarah through her website for more
information.
Q: I just started
implementing “Teen Proofing” (based on John Rosemond’s book of the same name),
and have realized that I micromanaged my 12-year-old horribly. Basically, for
the past five years, I’ve been a screaming banshee with him. Through family
therapy, I’ve regained control of my yelling, but my question is how do we undo
our 10 years of micromanaging?
A: The bad news is that, unfortunately, you can’t undo the
past, no matter how much you want to. But the good news is that you don’t have
to let the past influence your future. You made mistakes—we all do as
parents—and you’ll likely make some more going forward. If you haven’t already,
please do apologize for yelling so much at your kids. Then use the techniques
your therapist gave you to help you not allow screaming to be one of your
parenting tools in the future.
Not micromanaging your child’s lives will take discipline on
your part. I’d recommend before you do something for your child, count to 10
and then let him do it—or not do it, as the case may be. Let him rise to the
occasion or fall on his face. He should have been learning this all along, but
it’s not too late for him to catch up on this important life lesson.
|
Image courtesy of artur84/FreeDigitalPhotos.net
|
Above all, keep in mind that it’s the child who produces the
child, not the parent. Each of your children is perfectly capable of handling
his life. It might not look as pretty as when you do it—it will likely be messier
and at times sink into disaster zones, but by taking giant steps backward in
your parenting, you will be giving him the space he needs to figure out how to
do things and how to handle it when things go wrong. Be prepared for him to
balk at first. After all, you’ve been absorbing all the hits for him, smoothing
his way, right? Add the phrase, “You can do it, I will not help you with that”
to your vocabulary and use as often as needed—for him and you.
It will take a little time for you all to adjust, as you
keep backing away and allowing your child to step up to the plate. Also
remember that discipline doesn’t have to be meted out immediately with this age,
so if you need to step away to regain control—and avoid screaming—then do so.
You can deliver consequences later when you—and your son—have both cooled off.
In October, Sarah will
be giving a series of talks on “The Well-Behaved Child: Discipline that Really
Works” through the City
of Fairfax Parks and Recreation Department. Also in October, Sarah and Mary
Elizabeth Peritti will speak on “Parenting With Love & Leadership” in a
four-part webinar series. Contact Sarah through her website for more
information.
Have you ever yelled at your kids? That’s something that
every parent (including me!), no matter how well-behaved their kids are, has
done. But if you do it on a daily or hourly basis, that’s a lot of
frustration—more than you should have as a parent.
Most of us shout at our kids because of frustration or anger
at something they’ve done—or haven’t done. But some parents yell at their teens
as a form of punishment. A new
study from the University of Pittsburgh
and University of Michigan
recently published in the Journal of Child Development found that parents who
scream at their teens in this manner are upping the chances their children will
develop problem behaviors and depression.
“New research reveals that harsh verbal discipline in early
adolescence causes more harm than good. Instead of helping, harsh verbal
discipline might actually worsen problematic behavior in teens,” reports the
Counsel & Heal website. “Harsh verbal discipline can have a dramatic impact
on teen's emotional development. Researchers said this is true even among those
who enjoy a close relationship with their parents.”
|
Image courtesy of David
Castillo Dominici/FreeDigitalPhotos.net
|
“This is one of the first studies to indicate that parents'
harsh verbal discipline is damaging to the developing adolescent,” said lead
researcher Ming-Te Wang, assistant professor of psychology in education at the University
of Pittsburgh. “The notion that
harsh discipline is without consequence, once there is a strong parent-child
bond-that the adolescent will understand that ‘they're doing this because they
love me’-is misguided because parents’ warmth didn’t lessen the effects of
harsh verbal discipline.”
We as parents generally know that screaming at our kids isn’t
good—for us or them. But what the article didn’t cover was how to overcome that
yelling tendency.
Yelling at your children on a regular basis—and especially
as form of discipline—is symptomatic of parents who do not feel in control of their
parenting. A calm parent won’t scream at her child as much as one who is constantly
trying to figure out how to parent.
One way to stop hollering is to adopt Alpha Speech, which
basically means you talk like you’re the leader in your home. A leader doesn’t
constantly explain herself. Instead, a leader gives clear instructions in as
few words as possible, employing the Short and Sweet Principle: The fewer words
a parent uses when giving instructions or conveying expectations, the more
likely it is that the child will obey.
So stop the screaming and become an Alpha Speech expert. You’ll
be amazed at much calmer you’ll be as a parent—and how more obedient your
children will be as a result. And remember that obedient children are happier
children than their non-obedient peers.
Until next time,
Sarah
In October, Sarah will
be giving a series of talks on “The Well-Behaved Child: Discipline that Really
Works” through the City
of Fairfax Parks and Recreation Department. Also in October, Sarah and Mary
Elizabeth Peritti will speak on “Parenting With Love & Leadership” in a
four-part webinar series. Contact Sarah through her website for more
information.
Many of us make New Year’s Resolutions, and with the start
of a fresh school year, I propose parents write some New School Year
Resolutions of their own. Here are a few New School Year Resolutions every
parent should have.
Resolution 1. I will
not complain about my children’s teachers. This means, you will speak well
of their teachers, not ill. That publicly and privately you will not disparage
their teachers, especially in front of them or within their hearing. By the
very position as a teacher in your child’s school, that person deserves your
respect.
Resolution 2. I will
take the teacher’s word over my child’s. This used to be commonplace in
American homes, that if a teacher said a child had misbehaved, the parent would
believe the teacher over any protestations from the child, knowing that a child
is an unreliable witness to situations in which he has a stake. Make it clear
from the outset that you will not tolerate misbehavior in the classroom and
that it’s your child’s responsibility to learn how to get along with any
“difficult” teachers, much as it is with any “wonderful” teachers.
Resolution 3.
Homework is the sole responsibility of my child. In other words, you as a
parent should not take the onus of getting homework done on your shoulders.
“But what if my child doesn’t do her homework?” you ask. That’s the teacher’s
responsibility to address. If the teacher gives a poor grade on uncompleted
homework, then your child will suffer the consequences. If the teacher makes
your child sit out recess to finish her homework in class, then your child will
suffer the consequences. The only responsibility you have as a parent in regard
to homework is to make sure your child has a place to do it. That’s it. Other
than that, leave the homework to the child. After all, as I tell my kids, I have already passed elementary school.
Resolution 4: I will
not bring homework, musical instruments or lunches to school when my child has
left them at home. It is the child’s responsibility to make sure he leaves
for school with all the things he needs that day. The parent who takes that
responsibility on herself of bringing a left-behind item to school later is not
helping her child learn that responsibility. It’s better to have a child figure
out how not to forget things early in life than later in life. Less stress on
the parent, too.
For our family, this week heralds the dawn of a new era with
all four kids in school full time for the first time. I’m sure there will be
missed lunches, forgotten worksheets and tired bodies at some point this year.
But I know that with practice, our kindergartener, first grader, fourth grader
and fifth grader will develop their own routines for handling school
assignments and will figure out how to get along with their teachers. After
all, school is but a preview of life, and the more responsibility we give our
children, the more opportunities they have to shine and grow.
Until next time,
Sarah
|